QA – what is the work of a Quality Assurance Engineer? And how to become one?
- June 25
- 4 min
Testing your software solutions is mandatory to ensure that your product meets the highest quality standards. It’s not just about fixing bugs but also about verifying that your system functions as intended.Â
There are typically two types of software testing methods that help you in this regard: integration testing and system testing. Understanding the differences between both and how to apply them effectively is critical to the success of the software development process.Â
This article is your complete guide to system testing vs. integration testing and its benefits. Continue reading!
Typically, integration testing is a type of testing in which software modules are integrated and tested together as a unified group. The purpose of integration testing is to make sure all connected components of a system interact smoothly, paving the way for smooth data flow. Here are some types of integration testing:
In this type of integration testing, a software’s main modules or components are tested first, followed by small subordinate parts. This ensures that the primary component directly interacts with the user interface and other external systems and works smoothly without errors.Â
As the name implies, bottom-up integration testing involves bottom-up or lower-level modules first entering the testing phase. Once these small components, also known as leaf or child modules, are thoroughly tested and error-free, they are integrated into the main or high-level modules to create a highly efficient system.Â
The Big Bang Integration Testing doesn’t involve modules or submodules testing. Instead, in this approach, the lower and higher-level modules are taken as a whole system, and then tests are executed. While this approach is more comprehensive and less time-consuming, it can make bug detection in individual components a hassle.
Integration testing offers you many benefits, including high-quality software and risk reduction. Let’s discuss them in detail:
First things first—integration testing makes it easy for developers to detect problems and bugs early in the development cycle.Â
For instance, they can identify whether two system components communicate as expected or if there are dependency conflicts. This early detection not only improves software quality but also saves developers a lot of time.Â
Another benefit of integration testing is that it tests a system’s joint functionality. You can check how different components coordinate and communicate with each other to make the whole system successful. This is especially useful when different teams create various parts of the software.Â
Integration testing ensures that the end product is free from all issues and bugs. So, when users interact with your software solution, they experience a smooth and functional product that meets their expectations. This leads to high customer satisfaction, and customers tend to rely on your business for repeat purchases, generating stable revenue.Â
Although there are many benefits to integration testing, it also has some disadvantages, including high cost and time-consuming execution. Here’s a detailed explanation of these:Â
Compared to unit testing, where individual components are tested separately, integration testing is quite expensive. It requires configuring different environments and additional resources to simulate interactions between components. This enhanced workload not only exhausts your development team but also demands extensive finances, which may be a problem, especially if you are a small business owner.Â
Integration testing takes longer for complex systems with multiple lower-level components integrated into them. This can impact your team’s productivity and delay deadlines, impacting the overall software development lifecycle.Â
It’s a type of software testing in which you test the functionality of a fully integrated system. Its main goal is to make sure that the system is up to the set standards and completely ready to be deployed to the production environment. The types of system testing include functional testing, regression testing, and performance testing. Some other black box testing techniques are:
Security testing is a type of system testing in which testers check the complete software for vulnerabilities that hackers can misuse. It ensures that the software solution is strong enough with proper access controls to provide a positive customer experience.Â
This system testing type is all about evaluating the software’s usability. For instance, you’ve got to test how users interact with the interface and whether it’s easy to use. Doing so will ensure that the product meets high-quality standards and is developed considering customers’ needs and pain points.Â
In compatibility testing, your quality assurance or testing team sees how the software performs with other hardware or applications. It also involves checking the product’s performance across different browsers and devices to confirm compatibility and consistency across all platforms.Â
The advantages of system testing include the verification of systems compliance with industry standards and the availability of practical testing environments. Here’s a detailed explanation of these:
Before software goes into the development cycle, the business creates a regulatory framework and principles that guide its development. These are security protocols and specific functional requirements. Once the software is developed and integrated successfully, system testing enables you to check the system’s overall functionality against these predefined requirements. This ensures that the final product aligns with business goals and regulatory expectations.
Another significant advantage of system testing is that it can be performed in practical, real-world environments. Because the entire system has been developed and integrated, you can simulate real-time scenarios to test the software’s performance and reliability. For instance, you can create a testing environment that mimics the software’s actual operating conditions, expected user load, and interactions with other systems to increase system reliability.Â
System testing also comes with its fair share of disadvantages, including the need for advanced tools.Â
System testing can be done manually, but it’s time-consuming and may not be accurate. So, to perform system testing with high accuracy and efficiency, you require advanced testing tools like Selenium. They can be expensive and may strain your resources, which can dent overall business stability.Â
System testing is quite different from integration testing in its scope, objectives, and testing environment.
Let’s discuss this more:Â
System testing and integration testing differ significantly in their scope. System testing is comprehensive, covering both functional and non-functional testing areas such as security, usability, and overall performance.Â
On the other hand, integration testing is narrower in its approach and mainly focuses on the functional areas of the integrated software.Â
Another difference between system and integration testing is in their objectives and goals. For instance, system testing evaluates the entire system as a unified entity. It checks whether the system meets business requirements and functions properly in the intended environment.Â
In contrast, integration testing focuses more on assessing the connections and interactions of different software components. The primary goal is to identify and fix issues that may occur due to the connection of different modules.Â
The environments used in system testing and integration testing differ greatly in their setup. The former is conducted under real-world conditions and scenarios.Â
This means the system is tested in an environment that closely replicates the actual one in which it’ll be used by end users. For instance, it’s tested on intended hardware and operating systems to check its functioning.Â
The latter occurs in simulated environments where stubs and drivers mimic the working conditions.Â
Granularity generally refers to a process’s position in the testing sequence and its attention to detail. In software development, system testing is conducted after integration testing and before acceptance testing. Integration testing, on the other hand, is performed after unit testing and before system testing and is more granular.Â
The stakeholders involved in system and integration testing are also different. System testing is typically performed by testers who are not part of the programming or development team.Â
However, they can be part of the quality assurance team. Contrarily, integration testing is done by testers who work closely with developers and are more familiar with systems architecture.Â
In conclusion, System Testing and Integration Testing serve distinct roles in the software development lifecycle. While system testing focuses on validating the entire system’s functionality and performance in a real-world environment, integration testing focuses on interactions between individual components in a simulated environment.Â
The difference between system testing and integration testing is crucial for ensuring your software’s success. If you’re looking for expert assistance to handle these testing phases, let Hicron Software House support you. Our QA testing services are designed to deliver high-quality, reliable software that meets your business needs. Explore our Quality Assurance Testing services and take the next step toward flawless software development!