Blog

What is the difference between .NET Core and .NET Framework?

Monika Stando
Monika Stando
Marketing & Growth Lead
April 10
6 min
Table of Contents

.NET Core (now simply part of .NET) and the legacy .NET Framework are distinct Microsoft development platforms. .NET Core is open-source and runs across Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it ideal for modern cloud applications and microservices. In contrast, the .NET Framework targets primarily Windows-based software.

Understanding their architectural, compatibility, performance, and scalability differences is key for developers selecting the right tool for their project.

What Are .NET Core and .NET Framework?

.NET Core (evolving into modern .NET versions like .NET 6, 7, 8+) is a cross-platform, open-source framework built for today’s cloud-centric world. Its modular design and high performance suit scalable web apps and microservices running on Windows, Linux, or macOS.

.NET Framework is the original Windows-dependent software framework. It includes extensive libraries like Windows Forms and WPF for building rich desktop UIs. Its monolithic architecture integrates deeply with the Windows OS.

While both support languages like C# and VB.NET, their deployment targets differ. .NET Core’s lightweight nature thrives in cloud-native environments, whereas .NET Framework remains relevant for legacy Windows enterprise applications.

How do .NET Core and .NET Framework differ in architecture and performance?

.NET Core employs a modular architecture, letting developers include only necessary components. This minimizes overhead and boosts performance, especially for microservices and cloud computing. Its streamlined build uses resources efficiently, aiding scalability.

Conversely, the .NET Framework has a monolithic structure; the entire framework installation is typically required. This increases memory footprint and reduces flexibility compared to .NET Core, making it less optimized for modern cloud workloads.

.NET Core benefits from advanced runtime optimizations like improved Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation and Ahead-of-Time (AOT) support, speeding up execution. Enhanced asynchronous programming patterns also improve web application responsiveness—advantages largely absent in the older .NET Framework.

For scalability, .NET Core readily supports containerization via Docker and orchestration with Kubernetes, fitting distributed systems better than the more centralized .NET Framework. This makes .NET Core a strong choice for high-performance, cross-platform enterprise solutions.

How do .NET Core and .NET Framework support deployment and compatibility?

.NET Core offers flexible deployment options. Applications can be self-contained, bundling their runtime and dependencies, allowing different app versions to run side-by-side without conflict across Windows, Linux, and macOS. Releases are independent of system-wide updates.

The .NET Framework uses a centralized model, installed as part of Windows and updated via Windows Update. Applications share the installed runtime, which can lead to compatibility issues if different apps require different framework versions.

.NET Core ensures cross-platform compatibility through APIs defined in .NET Standard (and its successors). While .NET Framework supports backward compatibility within its Windows ecosystem, it lacks native cross-platform reach. These differences make .NET Core better suited for modern cloud and containerized deployments, while .NET Framework remains necessary for many legacy Windows applications.

How do .NET Core and .NET Framework support microservices and cloud applications?

.NET Core is purpose-built for microservices and cloud applications, leveraging its cross-platform nature and modularity. Developers can easily containerize services with Docker and manage them using Kubernetes. Its native support for building RESTful APIs simplifies communication in distributed systems, making it ideal for cloud-native architectures.

The .NET Framework wasn’t designed for microservices but can interact with REST APIs. It’s more aligned with traditional Windows hosting environments rather than modern, scalable cloud infrastructure.

For cloud deployments, .NET Core integrates smoothly with serverless platforms like Azure Functions and AWS Lambda. Its Linux container compatibility boosts scalability and cost-efficiency, positioning it as the preferred choice for modernizing applications.

What are the use cases for .NET Core and .NET Framework?

Choose .NET Core (modern .NET) for applications needing cross-platform support, high performance, and scalability. It excels in cloud-native solutions, microservices, APIs, and containerized deployments (Docker/Kubernetes). It’s also the foundation for serverless computing via Azure Functions or AWS Lambda.

Stick with .NET Framework for existing applications heavily reliant on Windows-specific features (like Windows Forms, WPF, WCF server implementations, or deep COM interop) or older technologies not available in .NET Core. It remains common in legacy enterprise systems tightly coupled with Windows services like Active Directory.

Essentially, new development focused on flexibility, cloud, and cross-platform reach should use modern .NET Core. Maintenance of established Windows-centric systems often continues on .NET Framework.

What are the security and support differences between .NET Core and .NET Framework?

Security approaches differ: .NET Framework included Code Access Security (CAS) for granular permissions, often used in enterprise settings. .NET Core omits CAS, relying instead on OS-level security features and modern practices like sandboxing, better suited for distributed environments.

Support models vary: .NET Core follows a Long-Term Support (LTS) schedule with regular feature updates and patches. .NET Framework is considered feature-complete and receives security/reliability updates as a Windows component.

For cloud security, .NET Core’s compatibility with containerization and platforms like Azure provides robust options. .NET Framework’s strengths lie in integrating with traditional Windows authentication mechanisms.

Organizations prioritizing ongoing innovation and cross-platform security generally favor .NET Core’s model. Those maintaining stable, Windows-based systems may find .NET Framework’s established security sufficient.

How Do .NET Core and .NET Framework differ in development ecosystem and tooling?

.NET Core fosters a modern development experience using lightweight tools. Its powerful Command Line Interface (CLI) facilitates automation, scripting, and DevOps practices across platforms. Developers commonly use editors like Visual Studio Code or full IDEs like Visual Studio or JetBrains Rider.

The .NET Framework ecosystem is traditionally centered around Visual Studio on Windows. While powerful for enterprise development, its tooling is less flexible for cross-platform or CLI-driven workflows common in cloud-native development.

.NET Core’s modularity works seamlessly with NuGet package management, allowing fine-grained control over dependencies. This positions .NET Core for agile, scalable development, while .NET Framework remains suitable for established Windows application development.

What are the benefits and limitations of .NET Core Compared to .NET Framework?

Key .NET Core benefits include cross-platform operation (Windows, Linux, macOS), superior performance, a modular architecture for leaner applications, and an active open-source community driving innovation.

Its main limitation is the lack of built-in support for some legacy Windows technologies (like WPF/Windows Forms designers, though community solutions exist) making migration complex for older desktop apps or systems heavily tied to Windows-specific APIs.

The .NET Framework’s strength lies in its mature support for Windows desktop development (WPF/WinForms) and deep integration with the Windows ecosystem. Its limitations are its Windows-only nature, monolithic structure, and generally lower performance compared to .NET Core, making it less suitable for modern, scalable cloud solutions.

In summary, choose modern .NET Core for new, scalable, cross-platform, or cloud-focused projects. Use .NET Framework primarily for maintaining existing Windows-dependent applications.

Monika Stando
Monika Stando
Marketing & Growth Lead
  • follow the expert:

Testimonials

What our partners say about us

Hicron’s contributions have been vital in making our product ready for commercialization. Their commitment to excellence, innovative solutions, and flexible approach were key factors in our successful collaboration.
I wholeheartedly recommend Hicron to any organization seeking a strategic long-term partnership, reliable and skilled partner for their technological needs.

tantum sana logo transparent
Günther Kalka
Managing Director, tantum sana GmbH

After carefully evaluating suppliers, we decided to try a new approach and start working with a near-shore software house. Cooperation with Hicron Software House was something different, and it turned out to be a great success that brought added value to our company.

With HICRON’s creative ideas and fresh perspective, we reached a new level of our core platform and achieved our business goals.

Many thanks for what you did so far; we are looking forward to more in future!

hdi logo
Jan-Henrik Schulze
Head of Industrial Lines Development at HDI Group

Hicron is a partner who has provided excellent software development services. Their talented software engineers have a strong focus on collaboration and quality. They have helped us in achieving our goals across our cloud platforms at a good pace, without compromising on the quality of our services. Our partnership is professional and solution-focused!

NBS logo
Phil Scott
Director of Software Delivery at NBS

The IT system supporting the work of retail outlets is the foundation of our business. The ability to optimize and adapt it to the needs of all entities in the PSA Group is of strategic importance and we consider it a step into the future. This project is a huge challenge: not only for us in terms of organization, but also for our partners – including Hicron – in terms of adapting the system to the needs and business models of PSA. Cooperation with Hicron consultants, taking into account their competences in the field of programming and processes specific to the automotive sector, gave us many reasons to be satisfied.

 

PSA Group - Wikipedia
Peter Windhöfel
IT Director At PSA Group Germany

Get in touch

Say Hi!cron

    Message sent, thank you!
    We will reply as quickly as possible.

    By submitting this form I agree with   Privacy Policy

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

    OK, I agree